The atmosphere among NHL fans has once again erupted following the game between the Montreal Canadiens and the Washington Capitals, as a controversial situation involving Patrik Laine suddenly became the center of attention. What happened on the ice was not simply a personal mistake, but also raised many questions about team spirit, responsibility, and the patience of the coaching staff.

In a context where every decision and every action can directly impact the outcome of the game, a hockey coaching expert has pointed out a crucial detail that may be the real reason why coach Martin St-Louis decided to “punish” Laine during the recent match.

This incident not only aroused curiosity among fans but also sparked heated debates about whether star players should be given special treatment or held accountable like any other player when they make mistakes. And the biggest question right now: Does Patrik Laine deserve to be sent to the press box in the next game?

Photo credit: Screenshot

A hockey coaching expert may have just identified the real reason why Patrik Laine was punished by Martin St-Louis last night.

This is very interesting information.

Topher Scott pointed to a very specific sequence, a very specific gesture by Patrik Laine, that seems to have been the final straw.

It really seems like it pushed Martin St-Louis’ patience over the edge.

Here’s an excerpt of his explanation, but in short, it’s a gesture made by Laine (right near the Canadiens’ bench) that directly led to the Washington Capitals’ game-winning goal.

A Very Poor Decision by Patrik Laine Before the Capitals’ Second Goal

Scott explains it as follows.

COACHES: One of the most underrated traits of winning hockey is great line changes. It’s so incredibly important, and last night we had two game winning goals directly impacted by them.

1. Montreal turns it over in the neutral zone and Patrik Laine changes. The puck gets transitioned right where he should be but since he gets off it creates the passing lane and the Caps feed their transition game.

Anderson can’t catch up after he gets off the ice which allows the time for a delay on the rush and BOOM – game winner for Washington. This play may be part of the reason Laine didn’t play in the third period.”

It’s really interesting! There’s even a video to back it up.

The point here isn’t to pile on Laine, but this was definitely an important sequence to highlight, especially since it didn’t come from a fan or an expert who only follows the Montreal Canadiens.

So, we can add this.. to this:

In your opinion, knowing all this, should Patrik Laine be sent to the press box tomorrow night?