Siblings Jack and Lily Sullivan are still missing, and it’s terribly sad how there have been no arrests or solid leads in the case, as far as the public knows. The latest we heard is that investigators have been scouring the neighborhood and local shops for camera footage. It is my opinion that they are trying to confirm proof of life on the Wednesday or Thursday before the children were actually reported missing.

It’s alarming how no one else on the property spoke out regarding the children. We learned that Daniel’s mother and brother lived in the camper at the back of the property. They never spoke to the media advocating for the children or even giving information on when they last saw the kids. It’s concerning.

Getting back to the condition of the property, we cannot speak for how the inside looked, but the outside was not safe for a four- and six-year-old to be playing. There are toys, tools, and other objects scattered all over the place, but online sleuths have noticed one thing that looks particularly clean: this ATV that the brother is relaxing on while the search was on for the children. It looks like the cleanest thing on the property. Others also pointed out how clean his shoes were. Just an observation.

Going back to what the biological dad’s aunt said is interesting, too. She believed that the children didn’t go into the woods because the dogs lost their scent at the end of the driveway. She thinks that they were taken away, either using a vehicle or, she specifically mentions, maybe an ATV that drove the children far away from their home.

As for the children’s mother, Mallaya, she hasn’t spoken out since the first and last interview she did. We’ve heard nothing further from her. She has reactivated her Facebook page, but posts nothing about the children. She has been adding a couple of new Facebook friends, though.

This entire case is really bizarre, and I believe foul play is involved. It’s only a matter of time before arrests are made. 

It’s been weeks since the two siblings were reported missing, and still—no confirmed sightings, no solid leads, and certainly no arrests. That in itself is disturbing. In many missing child cases, especially ones involving very young kids, police usually have at least some direction early on. A scent trail. A sighting. A witness. A clue. But here? It’s been a void. Investigators have shifted gears, combing through neighborhoods and local businesses for surveillance footage, hoping for even the slightest piece of proof that Jack and Lily were alive in the days before the report was made.

That detail alone—that they’re trying to establish proof of life on the Wednesday or Thursday before the children were reported missing—is hugely telling. It indicates police may suspect the children were already gone, or worse, before anyone picked up the phone to call 911. It’s the kind of approach law enforcement takes when the official timeline doesn’t add up.

The eerie silence from people who should be witnesses is hard to ignore. Daniel’s mother and brother were reportedly staying in a camper on the family property. If that’s true, they would have had a direct line of sight into the household’s day-to-day routine. Why haven’t they spoken out? Why didn’t they appear in media interviews, make a public plea, or at the very least, clarify when they last saw the children? Their absence from the public eye, especially during a time when every single voice matters, stands out as another red flag.

And then there’s the state of the property.

Photos shared online show what looks like a cluttered and unsafe yard—scattered tools, broken toys, debris everywhere. Not exactly the kind of environment where you’d feel safe letting a four- or six-year-old play unattended. But what some eagle-eyed followers of the case have picked up on is even more peculiar: amidst the mess, one object appears strikingly clean—an ATV. In a property filled with dirt, clutter, and neglect, why is this one vehicle spotless? Who cleaned it—and why?

That ATV becomes even more relevant when you remember what the children’s biological father’s aunt said. She pointed out that search dogs lost the children’s scent at the end of the driveway, a detail that doesn’t support the “they wandered off into the woods” theory. Instead, it suggests they left the property—possibly in a vehicle. She even speculated that it could have been an ATV that took them away. In rural areas, where trail access is easy, ATVs can be used to travel far and fast—and off the grid. It’s a haunting thought, but one that aligns with the possibility of foul play and concealment.

And what about the children’s mother, Mallaya? After that initial interview, she disappeared from public view. No emotional pleas, no updates, no interviews. Her Facebook account, which had been shut down, was recently reactivated—but no posts about Jack or Lily have been made. Instead, she’s been quietly adding friends. For most people, especially parents of missing children, social media becomes a tool for survival—a place to share photos, raise awareness, and keep the pressure on. Silence in that space can feel deafening.

Is it possible Mallaya is overwhelmed, traumatized, and simply doesn’t know how to respond publicly? Sure. Grief manifests in different ways. But the complete withdrawal, paired with the broader behavior of the household, creates a picture that feels more evasive than sorrowful.

It’s also not lost on many that there has been no official confirmation that the children were last seen by anyone outside the home. Without third-party confirmation—neighbors, school staff, store clerks—it becomes even harder to verify the timeline the parents provided. That’s why the RCMP is likely poring over every surveillance angle and financial record. They’re not just looking for the children anymore. They’re looking for a lie.

With each new day, the idea that this was simply a case of two kids getting lost in the woods fades further from reality. There’s been no evidence to support that theory—no dropped toy, no torn clothing, no trail. And now, the focus has quietly shifted to building a timeline and collecting surveillance. That isn’t a search mission. That’s an investigation.

The strange behavior of the people closest to the children, the silence from household members, the clean ATV, the lost scent at the driveway, the lack of proof of life in the days before the report—all of it points toward one devastating conclusion: foul play is likely. And someone on or near that property probably knows exactly what happened to Jack and Lily Sullivan.

Whether the RCMP is waiting for physical evidence, a forensic match, or a confession, one thing is clear: this investigation isn’t over. And while the public still hasn’t heard much from authorities, there are growing signs that something is happening quietly behind the scenes. If there’s a cover-up, it won’t last forever. The truth has a way of rising—and when it does, there will be questions to answer, and justice to serve.

In the end, this isn’t just a case. These are two innocent children who vanished without explanation. The longer the silence drags on, the more pressing the question becomes: who will speak for Jack and Lily?

Let me know if you’d like this rewritten for a particular platform—blog, newsletter, or even podcast script.