Malehya will crack soon says Lilly and Jack Sullivan’s step-dad 👀
It is Sunday morning, the 29th of June, and we’re going back to Nova Scotia today to talk about the disappearance of six-year-old Lily and her four-year-old brother, Jack Sullivan. They’ve been missing since May the 2nd from their Landown Station home over there in Canada.

A lot has happened over the last eight weeks, and we’re getting to the point now where there’s a lot of rumors, a lot of speculation, and we’ve got various family members who’ve come out and spoken.

We’ve had Malaya, their mother, speaking the day after their disappearance—May the 3rd. And then, shortly after she spoke to the media, she disappeared. Not literally disappeared, but she left. She left with baby Meadow, who was then 16 months old. Apparently, she’s living with her mother, and the custody for baby Meadow is all up in the air.

Daniel, the stepdad, has spoken out numerous times. And in this video, we’re going to look at some questions that he’s answered in a Facebook group.

We’ve also had the paternal grandmother, Belinda, come out speaking. She is Cod’s mother—Cody being Lily and Jack’s biological father. He hasn’t spoken out, but he’s had nothing to do with Lily and Jack’s life. He hasn’t seen them for the last three years. And given that Jack is only four, certainly Jack won’t remember him at all. And Lily may not even remember him either.
May be an image of 4 people, clarinet, oboe, poster and text
We’ve also had Daniel’s cousin, one of Malaya’s cousins—someone called Darren, who is Malaya’s grandma’s cousin. So that makes him Malaya’s first cousin twice removed.

Anybody else from the family? Can’t think.

Anyhow, several members of the family have spoken. But it’s what Daniel has said that has posed the most interest—certainly for me—because right from the jump I thought, there’s something not right here. Daniel isn’t quite telling the truth. There’s something off about this situation.

I found it interesting that the Behavior Panel covered his latest interview with CBC News, and they said that they didn’t see deception—but they believe he knows more than what he’s said so far. And he said that himself—that there’s stuff he can’t say. There’s more to this than meets the eye. I’m paraphrasing.

Team that with the things that Darren has been saying—Malaya’s first cousin twice removed—saying that Janie, Daniel’s mother (who hasn’t come out speaking), apparently saw Malaya on the driveway in the early morning of May the 2nd. And this was shortly after Malaya had put Lily and Jack in a car, and they had been driven away by someone.

One of Malaya’s friends. And they know exactly where the children are—at least Malaya does.

Daniel is now coming out answering questions about this situation. And it’s almost like he’s doubling down on this—saying that Malaya will crack.

So that’s what we’re going to talk about in this video. Let’s go.

All right, so these are messages from a Facebook group. I’ve copied these from It’s a Crime and a Shame. Sunny has been sharing these from a Facebook group. Now, I know which Facebook group it is, but I’m not a member of that one. So, I’ve applied to join because it’s a private group.

I wouldn’t normally share messages from a private group, but as Sunny has made them public, then I feel it’s fine to share them here.

The thing about the messages, though—it’s just Daniel’s responses rather than the questions as well. So I would prefer to see what questions he’s actually answering. These are just Daniel’s responses. They’ve just all been copied onto several slides.

And these are at least several days old—because that’s Daniel’s old profile picture. If we go to Daniel’s Facebook, this is his old profile picture. I’m not showing the full picture because his children are on here.

But this is a picture of all the children together. So Lily and Jack are somewhere here, and then Daniel has a son and a daughter from a previous relationship. And of course, that’s Meadow.

But what you can see from this is:
You got Daniel.
You got Malaya.
That’s Daniel’s daughter.
So you can see that that is that picture.

But he changed it. He changed it on June 24th. He changed it to a picture of him and Meadow. So these are at least four days old—at least. They may be way older. I don’t know. But just noting that—that is Daniel’s old profile picture.

Responses (Daniel’s words from Facebook group):

“She will go as long as she can,” referring to Malaya, I assume.
Not having the question, though, is a little bit annoying.

“Will crack after her mental health is put to the test with exams.”
Apparently, she’s taken a polygraph. He said this in the CBC News interview. So what “exams”? I don’t know.

“I’m saying too much. I believe they’re alive.”
Presumably, this is a question about Lily and Jack.

“Malaya knows who drove them off the property.”
So he’s now telling the same story that Darren told. He’s now doubling down on Darren’s story.

But could it be that Darren has been told a pack of lies—and Daniel is in on that pack of lies—and that he and his mother together have come up with this pack of lies to throw the scent off him?

It’s very possible that Darren is, in good faith, talking about this—that Daniel’s mother Janie has told him. But it’s lies. It’s not true.

So, we’ve got to keep an open mind. Everything is on the table.

Like I said, there’s lots of rumors. Lots of speculation. But when the family members are coming out speaking, then we’ve got to listen—and we’ve got to give those words careful consideration. These are not just random people making random statements. These are family members who have direct contact with Malaya—or at least had contact either just before or during the children’s disappearance.

So I’m not saying what Darren said is true—that it’s Malaya who arranged the children’s disappearance, and that she knows exactly where they are.

Because this could have been a story concocted by Daniel and Janie to throw everyone off the scent. And Janie has been talking to Darren, and Darren has fallen for this story.

I’m not saying that’s what’s happened. I’m just saying we’ve got to keep an open mind.

Anyway, Daniel is doubling down on Darren’s version of events:

“Malaya will crack soon.”

“Not one person in her family speaks to bring the kids home—which is true.”

“No one knew it started after Meadow was born.”
(Don’t know what that refers to. Maybe postnatal depression?)

“She also said the kids are in the woods. Stupid me. Believed that. And I searched and searched.”

“They’d then be moved to a different location.”

“She wanted birth certificates, school pics, and one stuffed animal for Lily and Jack.”

“She went on and on about trauma for the first year. Over and over. I had to say to her, ‘Stop it.’”

“It’s not her hiding them. It’s someone she knows. But she knows where they are.”

“I can’t go onto the reserve she belongs to. It’s dangerous for me.”

“She didn’t have the mental foresight to understand the complex nature of what she was about to do.”

“Two missing kids at the same time. One in a million.”

Some responses sound reflective or cryptic:

“She fell in love with Meadow, and Jack and Lily fell to the wayside. I lived it. I took care of them. She only cared for Meadow.”

“Isn’t it bizarre that if she had postnatal depression, you’d think it would be Meadow she’d struggle with?”

It’s like a role reversal.

Then there are questions Daniel appears to respond to:

“Can you please tell us, Daniel, what you believe Lily and Jack were wearing?”

“I wore both during the search. Navy blue one first night, white one second day.”

“Did Malaya take anything of yours?”

“She stole two shirts. One dark navy, one white. The ones I was wearing May 2nd and 3rd.”

“The clothes were something [emoji]. That morning. By whom?”

(No clear answer.)

“Is her lawyer family or criminal?”

“We both have family lawyers. Court battle for me.”

So we have to assume these posts are genuine. Sunny says these are from a Facebook group—but they look more like Messenger messages to me.

It’s interesting that Daniel is doubling down on Darren’s story. Again—it’s all rumor. All conjecture. Very little coming from RCMP.

If you want people to continue covering this story, then these are the kinds of things that are going to be talked about.

If you don’t like that—then stop following the case.

Every time I post a video about Lily and Jack, I have a handful of people who are rude. I mean really rude—and they end up getting banned.

Don’t mind people having different opinions. That’s great. It makes the world go round. But you’ve got to be respectful.

So if you’re rude, abusive—you’ll get blocked. Simple as that.

But the case is almost two months old now. So many people are coming out and speaking. If you want to cover the case, this is what there is to cover.

If you don’t like it—stop following the case. Simple as that.

All right, guys. Let me know what you think in the comments. I know you will.