DANIEL PUSHES BLAME FULLY ON MALEYHA?! | LILLY AND JACK SULLIVAN
What are the chances of a child vanishing from a remote location with a dog that apparently barks at everything — and three adults on the property?
I would say, pretty slim.

Now ask yourself: what are the chances of two children going missing from a property like that without someone close to them being involved?

If Jack and Lily wandered into the woods, I am almost positive investigators would have found more evidence.
But then the scent ends at the end of the driveway. What sense does that make — if investigators have nothing to suggest that the children were abducted?

Was this entire thing a planned abduction by someone close to the children?
Did they get themselves in too deep, and now it’s too late to go back and undo this?
Did they not think this would turn into such a massive case — that people from around the world would know Lily and Jack’s names?

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Anyway, Daniel replied to a comment on Facebook, and his comment could possibly give a reason as to why there have been no updates from police in recent weeks on this case.

He says: “The mother,” meaning Mallaya, “did not hide them. The proposed theory is that the mother escorted them quietly to a vehicle. Then the vehicle drove them to an unknown location where they remain in hiding. Investigators are still hard at work determining the exact unknown location.”

It doesn’t really make sense.
He is saying Mallaya didn’t hide them — but she escorted them to a vehicle.
What does that mean?

Does he mean she orchestrated the entire thing, but doesn’t know where they are now?
Or that she gave them away?

I mean, if this is the case, it would certainly make Mallaya’s behavior make sense.

Belinda says Mallaya didn’t cry the day she was there searching for the kids.
She didn’t have tears in her eyes.
Mallaya never held a search.
She left almost immediately after the children vanished.
She believes they were kidnapped — but never pleaded or offered a reward for their safe return.
She doesn’t speak to media to keep their case out there.
Doesn’t use social media to advocate for them.

This whole case is bizarre.

I’m hoping the lack of updates from police means that they are close to finding out what happened — and are not updating us in order to not jeopardize the case. 

The disappearance of Jack and Lily Sullivan continues to raise urgent and troubling questions, not only about what happened on that remote property, but about the people closest to them—those who should have been their protectors. More than two months have passed, and with each day that goes by without resolution, the suspicion surrounding this case grows deeper.

Consider the circumstances: two young children vanish from a rural property. There were not one, not two, but three adults present on the day they disappeared. The house had a dog—reportedly one that barks at everything, even small disturbances. And yet, somehow, two toddlers managed to leave without anyone hearing or seeing a thing?

The odds of even one child disappearing under these conditions are extremely low. But two? At the same time? From a home with watchful adults and an alert dog? The chances are slim to none—unless someone directly involved facilitated their disappearance.

Some argue the children may have simply wandered off into the woods. But if that were the case, it’s likely there would have been some evidence by now: footprints, torn clothing, items dropped along the way, or even a scent trail that led further into the forest. Instead, the dogs brought in for tracking reportedly traced the children’s scent to the end of the driveway—and then nothing. The scent just stopped.

That kind of abrupt ending doesn’t suggest a child wandering through the woods. It suggests a vehicle. It suggests a pickup. And more than that, it suggests planning.

Was this an abduction carried out by someone the children knew? Someone they trusted? Did someone lead them out quietly and place them into a vehicle, under the assumption that they’d never be found—or never be looked for?

And if so, did the person responsible believe this case wouldn’t attract attention? That it would be brushed off, or quickly forgotten? If that was the plan, it was deeply miscalculated. Jack and Lily’s names are now known around the world, and the public has taken notice of every strange twist, every inconsistency, and every silence.

One of the most startling developments in recent days was a comment made by Daniel—Mallaya’s partner and the man who lived in the home with her and the children. In a Facebook reply, Daniel said something that raised more questions than it answered.

“The mother did not hide them,” he wrote. “The proposed theory is that the mother escorted them quietly to a vehicle. Then the vehicle drove them to an unknown location where they remain in hiding. Investigators are still hard at work determining the exact unknown location.”

It’s a bizarre statement.

First, Daniel claims Mallaya didn’t hide the children—but in the same breath, says she “escorted them quietly to a vehicle.” That alone implies participation, intent, and foreknowledge. Escorting them to a vehicle is not something accidental. It’s not wandering. It’s not panic. It’s coordination.

So what is Daniel really suggesting? That Mallaya orchestrated the disappearance, handed them off to someone, and now has no idea where they are? That she’s part of the plot, but only partially?

This theory, though odd, would at least explain some of Mallaya’s behavior—behavior that many people, including Jack and Lily’s paternal grandmother Belinda, have called out as emotionally flat or even indifferent.

Belinda has stated that on the day of the children’s disappearance, when family and volunteers were out searching, Mallaya didn’t cry. Her eyes were dry. She didn’t hold a public search. She didn’t organize a community effort. She left the property quickly after the children went missing and has barely spoken about them since.

She claims to believe they were kidnapped, and yet never pleaded with the public for their safe return. She hasn’t offered a reward. She hasn’t spoken to media outlets. She hasn’t used social media to advocate for Jack and Lily’s case, to share their photos, or to keep their story alive. In an era where most parents would be flooding Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram with their missing children’s images, her near-complete silence feels impossible to ignore.

The behavior doesn’t match that of a desperate mother searching for her kids. And Daniel’s recent comments seem to subtly shift blame in her direction—without fully owning what that accusation implies. If she did escort them to a vehicle, why hasn’t she been arrested? Why hasn’t that vehicle—or driver—been identified?

These are the questions law enforcement is no doubt wrestling with behind the scenes. But they aren’t offering many updates either. Weeks have gone by without official statements. No press conferences, no timelines, no arrests. This lack of information has sparked worry among those following the case closely, but there’s also hope that the silence is intentional—that investigators are quietly closing in on the truth and don’t want to risk compromising the case by releasing premature details.

In many child disappearance cases, law enforcement holds back critical information to preserve the integrity of the investigation. It’s possible that’s what’s happening here. After all, if someone close to the children was involved—if someone orchestrated a calculated abduction—then any leak could tip that person off or give them time to destroy evidence.

Still, public pressure is mounting. People want answers. And they want accountability. From Daniel. From Mallaya. From anyone who was on that property and has yet to fully explain their role, their knowledge, or their silence.

There are too many unanswered questions. Why did the dog not bark? Why did the scent trail stop at the end of the driveway? Why did a step-grandmother resist police searches? Why has no one—not Mallaya, not Daniel, not anyone besides Belinda—stepped forward to advocate for Jack and Lily?

This is not just a missing persons case anymore. It’s a story riddled with silence, contradictions, and people who seem more focused on distancing themselves than on finding the truth.

What we do know is this: two innocent children are still missing. And until they’re found, the spotlight should remain on those who last saw them—and what they did or didn’t do in the critical hours and days that followed.