On May 2nd, 2025, in the isolated woods
of Lansdown Station, Nova Scotia,
6-year-old Lily Sullivan and her
four-year-old brother, Jack vanished
from their trailer home. For months,
their case has been a maze of secrets.
But a shocking new update has ignited
chaos. A mother’s accusation against a
grandmother, a mysterious blanket found
miles away, and hours that don’t add up.

Is this the breakthrough to find Lily
and Jack or a desperate act to bury the
truth? Stay with us because this case
just plunged into a darker spiral and
the answers might tear a family apart.
On Gearlock Road, Lily and Jack lived
with their mother Mallia Brooks Murray,
stepfather Daniel Martell, baby sister
Meadow, and nearby Daniel’s mother,
Janie McKenzie, in her RV. A new wave of
accusations and chilling discoveries
shared through texts and interviews has
fractured this case. We’ll dissect every
detail step by step like true detectives
to uncover what they mean for Lily and
Jack. Let’s dive in. Don’t abandon Lily
and Jack. Their innocent faces beg for
justice, and every second you hesitate,
their hope fades. Hit subscribe and ring
the bell now. Join Untold Crimes and
Affairs to keep their fight alive.
Turning away leaves them lost in the
shadows.
Malia Brooks Murray, Lillian Jack’s
mother, has unleashed a bombshell. She’s
called the police on Belinda Gray, the
children’s biological grandmother,
accusing her of lying and harassment.
“She’s making claims I did away with my
kids,” Malia allegedly told the RCMP,
claiming Belinda’s actions are
defamatory. Let’s break this down
because this family feud could reveal a
mother’s desperation or a calculated
move to silence a truth seeker. Malia
claims Belinda has been relentless
spreading accusations on YouTube and
Facebook groups that she’s responsible
for Lilian Jack’s disappearance.
Belinda, a vocal advocate for the
children, insists she’s only voicing
suspicions about the three adults
present on May 2nd, Malia, Daniel, and
Janie. Malia’s police complaint filed
for defamation and harassment, alleges
Belinda’s claims forced her to block her
months ago, but Belinda denies direct
contact, stating she’s only shared
opinions publicly, not targeted Malia
personally. Why escalate to the police
now? Is Malia protecting her innocence
or deflecting from scrutiny as Belinda’s
activism gains traction? This clash sets
the stage for deeper revelations.
Belinda Gray is no stranger to this
case. She’s been a tireless voice,
organizing fundraisers and pleading for
answers. In a recent interview, she
revealed the RCMP contacted her about
Malia’s complaint, accusing her of
defamation for suggesting Malia, Daniel,
or Janie are suspects. Let’s dissect her
response because her words could expose
a mother’s guilt or a grandmother’s
righteous anger. Yesterday morning, my
day started out with um where I had left
messages concerning the fundraiser and
Malaya and Lana speaking and what was
going on there that what my concerns
were and how I found out that it was
Malaya speaking. Um they finally got
back to me yesterday morning.
Now, sadly, it’s not great news that
there’s really not a whole lot to report
from the crime unit because they have no
suspects whatsoever. They have no
evidence as of yet,
and they’re just as bewildered as
everybody else on what happened to these
two kids. I stated, I I don’t know how
you guys can say that there was only
three people there with these two kids.
>> I said, you must be able to lay charges.
There was only three people there.
There was nobody else. Just those three
and possibly four if I still don’t know.
>> Um and he stated, “Well, you need
evidence and we don’t have any at this
time. We are still searching and trying
to find the answers.” I do know a lot of
their forensics has not come back yet
for the testing. So fingers and
everything crossed that here is hoping.
But I um I think this case kind of went
cold the very first day when they didn’t
close off the trailer and everybody was
typesing in and out that I I think it
was a mess up from from the start.

Yesterday afternoon, early afternoon, I
get a call from an RCMP officer and he
states that a complaint was lodged
against me and it was lodged against me
by Malaya for defamation of character
and harassment.
So I asked him what he was talking about
and he said, “Well,” he said, “You’re
you’re making claims that that she’s
guilty of doing away with her kids.”
He said, “And while she’s had to to
block you from the harassment.” I said,
“Well,” I said, “First off, Malaya
blocked me on Facebook months ago.”
So I said, “I had no contact with
Malaya.” So he said, “Well, how were you
reaching her?” I said, “I wasn’t
reaching her.” I said, “I have been on a
YouTube channel.” And I stated it’s a
crimeing chain. I said there is a couple
attack groups on Facebook that I am on
to and I voiced my opinion. I said I’ve
never called her a K. I’ve never stated
she’s un alive to anybody. I have
strictly stated that there are three
people there. Her, Daniel, and Janie. In
my eyes, they are all suspects.
And until the police can prove
otherwise, they are all suspects.
Belinda insists she’s never directly
called Malia a killer, only stating the
obvious. Only three adults, Malia,
Daniel, and Janie, were at the property
when Lily and Jack vanished. They’re all
suspects until proven otherwise, she
told investigators frustrated that the
RCMP have no suspects or evidence,
calling the investigation bewildered.
Her public posts on tag groups and
appearances on platforms echo this,
focusing on awareness, not defamation.
Yet, Malia’s complaint paints Belinda as
a harasser, even alleging a second
complaint from someone named Cheryl,
possibly tied to a fundraising dispute.
Is Belinda’s activism crossing a line?
Or is Malia’s legal move a sign of
panic? As suspicion mounts, a new clue
about a blanket shifts our focus.
Janie McKenzie, Daniel’s mother, has
dropped a chilling detail. A piece of a
blanket, possibly linked to Lily or
Jack, was found on Lansdown Road, not
Landown Station Road, miles from the
family’s trailer. Janie claims she
wasn’t present when it was found, but
confirms Daniel showed the rest of the
blanket to the RCMP from their garbage.
Let’s unravel this because this
blanket’s journey could point to a
coverup or an innocent coincidence.

>> I do own another piece of land, but the
land that I own is between my ex and my
brother. It is 7 acres and there is no
water.
It’s not by the ocean. It’s not by
anything. There’s no brook on it.
There’s no water at all on it. So, if
you go to Google Maps, you will find the
piece of land between my axis, which is
Daniel and Justin’s father, and my
brothers.
And that would be on the Landsdown Road,
not the Landown Station Road. Repeat,
the Landsdown Road.
And to correct Haley and whoever else,
the piece of blanket was found on the
Landsdown Road, not the Lands Down
Station Road. I cannot answer questions
about that blanket because I was not
here when it was supposed to be found.
Uh, I’m just hearing where she said it
was. I’m correcting her that it was the
Lands Down Road. The only time that I
was here to have any part of the blanket
was when the cops RCMP came here and
asked about the blanket to Daniel.
Daniel and Justin went did go to the
garbage and showed the RCMP offers
officers the rest of the blanket. And I
can vouch for the blanket being put in
the garbage because I seen the day that
Daniel put it in the garbage because I
told him not to bag it too heavy. So
Daniel did put the blanket in the
garbage.

>> Janie clarifies the blanket was found on
Landown Road near her ex-husband and
brother properties. Correcting earlier
confusion with Lands Down Station Road.
She vouches for seeing Daniel place it
in the garbage, warning him not to bag
it too heavy. This raises questions. Why
was the blanket in the trash? And how
did a piece end up miles away on a dirt
road? Was it carried by wind, as Janie
implies, or deliberately moved? The
RCMP’s interest in the blanket suggests
it’s evidence, but Janie’s absence
during its discovery and her vague
account, I’m just hearing where she said
it was, leave gaps. Could this be a
critical clue or a distraction from
Malia’s accusations? Another detail
complicates the timeline. Lily and
Jack’s truth is buried in secrets. Don’t
let their light fade. Subscribe now and
hit the bell. Ignoring their story is
like silencing their cries. Join us or
their hope is lost. The day before Lily
and Jack vanished, Malaya, Daniel, and
the children traveled Highway 289 for
errands, an outing now under scrutiny
for unaccounted hours. Google Map
screenshots reveal stops at a Dollarama,
a medical center, and possibly three
other locations. But a gap from 12:49
p.m. to 1:44 p.m. raises alarms. Let’s
break this down because these missing
minutes could hold the key to the truth.
On May 1, the family left home at 12:10
p.m., driving 16 miles in 39 minutes to
a medical center, then to Dalorama from
1:44 p.m. to 2:36 p.m. and other stops
until 3:11 p.m. But a 55minute gap,
12:49 to 1:44 p.m., is unaccounted for
with only a vague reference to a blood
workplace. Why the missing hour? Were
Lily and Jack with them, or did
something happen during this window? The
route passed dirt roads, a cemetery, and
waterfalls near Lands Down Road, where
the blanket fragment was later found.
Could this gap connect to that
discovery, or is it an innocent
oversight in a chaotic day? Another clue
adds intrigue. A star-shaped patch,
possibly from Lily’s jacket, was found
on an unnamed wooden bridge near Landown
Station Road, close to the family’s
home. Janie speculates it could have
fallen off due to wear, but its
discovery near the blanket’s location
raises suspicions. Let’s examine this
because this tiny clue could point to a
child’s path or a planted distraction.
Janie describes the star as a patch that
might have detached from Lily’s
well-worn jacket found on a dirt road
bridge over the middle river. Its
proximity to Landown Road where the
blanket was found is striking. Both
locations are dirt roads far from the
trailer. Did Lily and Jack travel
together carried by someone or
something? The RCMP has bagged the star
for analysis alongside the blanket. But
Jan’s casual explanation like stuff like
that falls off feels dismissive with no
confirmed link to Lily. Is this evidence
of her presence or a coincidence
muddling the investigation? The RCMP’s
silence adds pressure. Belinda’s
interview reveals a chilling reality.
The RCMP’s investigation is stalled with
no suspects, no evidence despite
extensive searches. She criticizes their
failure to use cadaavver dogs early or
secure the trailer on May 2, calling it
a mess up from the start. Let’s probe
this because her frustration could
expose investigative flaws or fuel
Malaya’s accusations of harassment.
Belinda’s outrage centers on the three
adults present, Malaya, Daniel, Janie,
and a possible fourth, Justin, whose
role remains unclear. “You must be able
to lay charges,” she told the RCMP,
baffled that no one has been named a
suspect. The lack of forensic results
and the trailer’s unsecured state on day
one suggest lost opportunities.

Malaya’s complaint against Belinda
alongside another from Cheryl tied to a
fundraising dispute complicates matters.
Is Belinda’s push for answers crossing
into defamation as Malaya claims or is
the stalled investigation driving her to
speak out? Malaya’s silence on these
clues raises questions. Malaya’s police
complaint against Belinda and her
silence on the blanket and star
discoveries paint a complex picture. She
accuses Belinda of lying yet offers no
alternative explanation for the evidence
or the unaccounted hours. Let’s dissect
her actions because they could reveal a
grieving mother or a calculated effort
to control the narrative. Malaya’s move
to call the police on Belinda suggests
desperation to silence her grandmother’s
accusations, but her retreat since May
3rd, leaving a day after reporting the
children missing, fuels suspicion. Her
claim that Belinda’s statements are
defamatory, hinges on public posts, not
direct contact, as Belinda blocked her
months ago. The blanket and star
potentially linked to Lily go unressed
by Malaya and her absence during the May
1 timeline gap raises questions. Is she
a mother overwhelmed by grief and a
stalled investigation or deflecting from
her own inconsistencies.
The family’s fractures demand answers.
Lily and Jack’s faces haunt us, lost in
a tangle of betrayal. Don’t let them
fade. Subscribe now and hit the bell.
Turning away is like burying their hope.
Be their voice or their light goes out.
Lily Sullivan, six, with her sparkly
Barbie tops and Jack, four, in his
dinosaur boots are more than a mystery.
Their children caught in a storm of
accusations and clues. Malaya’s war
against Belinda, the blanket on Lands
Down Road, and unaccounted hours demand
we keep their faces alive. If you know
anything, call the Northeast Nova Scotia
RCMP Major Crime Unit at 902-896560
[Music]

or Nova Scotia Crimestoppers at 1800222
TIPS. The $150,000 reward awaits. Your
tip could bring them home. Lily and Jack
Sullivan’s case has been shattered by a
mother’s betrayal and chilling clues, a
blanket, a star, missing hours. Is
Malaya silencing Belinda to protect her
innocence or to hide a darker truth?
What secrets lie on lands down road?
Share your thoughts in the comments. We
read everyone. Subscribe to Untold
Crimes and Affairs and hit the bell to