Police spoke to THIS NEIGHBOR !! | LILLY AND JACK SULLIVAN
I strongly believe that foul play is involved in the disappearance of siblings Jack and Lily Sullivan. It’s been too long, and if they wandered into the woods, how far could the two young children really get? There would have been more evidence.

Police continue to stand by their decision not to put out an Amber Alert because there are no signs of an abduction. The more information that comes out, the more I believe they are looking for evidence and believe that foul play is involved.

I feel that they are looking for proof of life on the Wednesday and Thursday, the days before the children vanished, because who says they didn’t vanish much earlier than when they were reported missing?

Yesterday, I brought some information about someone reporting the police showing up at their workplace to look for camera footage after finding information in the banking records of the parents.

Today, the neighbor speaks out and shares that police visited her as well. Melissa Scott said she was visited on May 20th by two officers from the RCMP’s Major Crime Unit. They inquired if she had any trail cameras set up on her 16-hectare property in Glengary Station, roughly 5 kilometers east of the children’s home.

Melissa told police she has seven trail cameras in total on her property. One points down her driveway. Another is positioned near the house, and the rest are scattered throughout the woods. It takes about an hour to walk between them. She said she told investigators that she was so happy to see them and to see that they are canvassing a little further and looking at trail cam footage.

Melissa said she was given a USB drive to load her trail camera footage onto. She was initially asked to give them her footage from May 1st to May 3rd, but they later expanded their request to include April 27th to May 3rd. She said she handed over hours of footage on Thursday afternoon.

Melissa said she posted in a private community Facebook group asking her neighbors if they too had been visited by the RCMP. She said two other people responded that they had also been approached for footage. Other neighbors also confirmed to media that they had been approached for footage.

Melissa checked the trail cameras but didn’t notice anything out of the ordinary. She says maybe the police will see something that she didn’t notice. 

The disappearance of Jack and Lily Sullivan has gripped the community with fear, heartbreak, and a growing sense of suspicion. As the days turn into weeks, the idea that these two young children simply wandered off into the woods becomes harder and harder to believe. Many people now feel what once seemed like an unthinkable possibility—foul play—is becoming the most logical explanation.

From the start, the RCMP made the unusual decision not to issue an Amber Alert. Their reasoning was that there were no signs of an abduction, but that in itself has only raised more questions. If there was no abduction, and if no evidence points to the children being in the woods, then what did happen? And more importantly, when did it happen?

Suspicion has been growing that the timeline given by the parents may not be accurate. Investigators, it seems, are quietly working behind the scenes to reconstruct what really occurred during the days leading up to the reported disappearance. Several sources close to the investigation believe the RCMP is actively seeking proof of life for Jack and Lily on the Wednesday and Thursday before they were reported missing—suggesting that law enforcement may suspect the children were gone well before the call for help ever came in.

Supporting that theory is a key development that surfaced just days ago. A local worker claimed that RCMP officers showed up at his workplace, asking for surveillance footage connected to a banking transaction involving one of the parents. The footage was reportedly from a time before the children were declared missing. That type of inquiry points to something very specific: investigators trying to verify whether the children were with the parent during the transaction—or if their absence began earlier than stated.

Now, new information has emerged that strengthens the theory that foul play is suspected—and that police may be closer than ever to building a case. A neighbor of the Sullivan family has come forward to share her interaction with investigators. Melissa Scott, who lives about five kilometers east of the Sullivan home in Glengary Station, owns a 16-hectare property equipped with multiple trail cameras. On May 20th, two officers from the RCMP’s Major Crime Unit arrived at her home.

Melissa said she was both relieved and surprised to see the officers, and she welcomed their questions. They wanted to know if she had any trail cameras positioned around her property that may have captured movement or activity in the days surrounding the disappearance. As it turns out, she has seven cameras: one pointed down her long driveway, another closer to her house, and the remaining five scattered throughout her wooded acreage. Walking to each camera takes about an hour in total.

The RCMP officers gave Melissa a USB drive and initially asked for footage from May 1st to May 3rd. However, not long after, they expanded that request—asking for all video from April 27th through May 3rd. That change is important. It suggests the RCMP believes something may have occurred even earlier than the public has been told. Expanding the search window like that indicates that the official “disappearance date” may not reflect the actual last sighting of the children.

Melissa gathered the requested footage and handed it over to the investigators by Thursday afternoon. She admitted that, upon reviewing the videos herself, she didn’t see anything unusual—but she also acknowledged that the RCMP might spot something she missed. These trail cameras are designed to pick up motion: people walking by, vehicles driving through, or even shadows or movement through the trees. Sometimes, what seems like an insignificant image can be a crucial puzzle piece when examined by trained investigators.

Wanting to help even more, Melissa posted in a private community Facebook group to ask if any of her neighbors had also been contacted by police. Two people replied, saying they had also been approached for their camera footage. Other neighbors later confirmed to media outlets that they too had been asked to provide whatever surveillance footage they had from around their properties.

This widespread canvassing effort is telling. It’s not the kind of thing typically done in a missing persons case where children are believed to have simply walked away. This is targeted, deliberate investigative work aimed at reconstructing a timeline—and potentially catching a lie. Investigators are working to either confirm or challenge the parents’ account by collecting unbiased digital evidence: footage, timestamps, vehicle sightings, and movement patterns.

It is also increasingly clear that the Major Crime Unit’s involvement isn’t just a formality. These officers don’t come into a case unless there’s real concern that a criminal act may have taken place. The very fact that they’re now handling aspects of the investigation strongly suggests that the RCMP believes this may be more than just a search—it may be a case of misdirection, concealment, or worse.

All of this adds to the growing unease that the children may not have simply vanished—they may have been gone long before anyone even noticed. And if that’s the case, then every hour of footage, every timestamp on a grocery store receipt, every silent camera watching a driveway might be part of the answer.

So far, the RCMP has not made any arrests, and they continue to keep many details of the investigation under wraps. But the pattern is becoming clearer to anyone paying attention: the police appear to be building a careful case, one piece of evidence at a time, while avoiding public missteps or premature announcements. If foul play was involved—and many now believe it was—they are likely working toward a moment where they can move with confidence.

Melissa’s cooperation, and the cooperation of her neighbors, may prove pivotal in the coming weeks. Something—some clue, some detail—might be buried in those hours of trail camera footage. A car pulling into a driveway. A figure walking through the woods. A timestamp that breaks the parents’ timeline in half. The community is watching, waiting, and hoping for answers.

One thing is certain: something happened to Jack and Lily Sullivan. And someone knows the truth. The question now is how much longer it will take before that truth finally comes to light.