FOLLOW UP on ITEMS FOUND during Search for Lilly and Jack Sullivan!
Today, we’re going to be talking about little Lily and Jack Sullivan. I came on yesterday and shared some information that I had come across, and today we’re going to dig a little deeper into it. That information was about clothing items being found during the search.

Now, I’ve found sources that back that up. And to all of you who supported me—saying, “I hope this leads us to Lily and Jack”—thank you. We still don’t know the full answer, but we’re trying.

To the handful of you who tried to say I was clickbait or lying just because the RCMP hadn’t confirmed it—well, now I know (thanks to you!) that RCMP stands for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. I appreciate you educating me on that. I’m from the United States, not Canada, so I enjoy learning about the regions where these cases happen.

Let me just say hello to everyone joining in—thank you to the mods for hopping on! I’m not going to be on too long, but I might come back on later this evening. Let me just get this up on the board real quick.

So, what’s happened—and I’ll show you all of this—is that clothing items, including a water bottle, a blanket, and some shirts, were found. Investigators then went to Daniel (the stepfather) and asked, “Do these items belong to Lily or Jack?” And he said, “No.”

Now, using common sense, I would assume they’re doing this to gauge his reaction, but I pray to God they are also following up in other ways to determine if any of these items are connected to the kids. Because at this point, remember—the last confirmed proof of life we have for Lily and Jack goes back to Tuesday, April 29, after they were dropped off by the school bus driver.

That’s concerning. Also, dogs didn’t pick up the children’s scent leading away from the property—not even across the road. When you think about the time gap between Tuesday and Friday, that’s enough time for weather, wind, and other factors to cause a scent to dissipate if the children went missing earlier.

Hi Cheryl, Nikki, Zoe, Rage, Ocean Deep—good to see you all! Hey Jennifer Slinn and Chamba—love you guys.

So let’s talk details. Yesterday, I mentioned that a searcher named Brandon Lemieux found items like small socks, little girl’s underwear with what appeared to be B-L-O-O-D, and a purple headband. Thank you to those who helped me pronounce his name right!

Brandon has been out searching since day one and has turned over several items to authorities. Now, let me be clear: I never said he picked them up or contaminated them. Some people assumed that, but that’s not what I implied.

Let me show you the evidence. First, a commenter (who I’ve been following closely and is local) named Trash Panda Amanda said:
“I can confirm this is my cousin. He led the RCMP and search and rescue to the brook where he found the items. They took over the area. Beyond that, he knows nothing else.”

Next, I went to a site that’s documenting every single detail of this case: CrimeTimelines.com. On that site, you’ll see an entry for May 6 that states:

“Items are found during the search, including children’s clothing and a water bottle. The children’s stepfather, Daniel Martell, states these items do not belong to Lily or Jack, raising questions about their origin.”

And that’s the part that matters: “raising questions about their origin.”

If it were just a random water bottle in the woods, nobody would question it. But if it’s something like little girl’s underwear with blood, that would absolutely raise red flags. So the question becomes: Could someone be planting these items to misdirect the investigation? I don’t know—but it’s worth considering.

Again, I don’t make things up. I’ve been doing this work since 2016—helping find missing people and working on true crime cases. It wouldn’t be worth my reputation just to chase clicks.

Now let’s talk about the children’s mother, Malia Brooks Murray. She reportedly deleted her Amber Alert request from social media in the past few days. If she still believed it was an abduction, why delete it?

If the RCMP told the family not to talk to the media to protect the investigation, then why is Daniel allowed to speak publicly? That’s suspicious. Is he breaking the rules, or was that “no media” instruction something given by a lawyer rather than police? Because usually, police want the public to share information and tip lines.

If you have time to update your social media, delete pictures of your boyfriend, and scroll your feed, you definitely have time to post your kids’ pictures and a tip line. I’m just saying—it’s not normal behavior.

And to those saying, “Well, Daniel volunteered to take a polygraph”—let’s be real. It’s a well-known fact that no polygraph is currently available, and it might take months. So saying you’re “willing” doesn’t mean much when the test isn’t even accessible.

I truly, with all my heart, pray that Lily and Jack Sullivan are found safe and brought home. That’s all I want. And I hope you’re all praying too.