Follow Us

The New York Yankees’ aggressive offseason strategy has drawn considerable attention, particularly in the wake of Juan Soto’s departure to the New York Mets. While many anticipated a corresponding move to counter their crosstown rivals’ acquisition, perhaps by pursuing Mets’ slugger Pete Alonso, recent revelations indicate the Yankees maintained a distinctly different perspective on the situation.

ESPN’s Jorge Castillo reports that the Yankees exhibited no genuine interest in acquiring Alonso, even before securing Paul Goldschmidt as their solution at first base. Instead, the organization directed its resources toward acquiring talents like Max Fried, Cody Bellinger, and Devin Williams, demonstrating a more diversified approach to roster enhancement.

“At the time of the trade for Bellinger, the Yankees were still shopping for a first baseman,” he wrote. “They never had interest in signing Pete Alonso, sources said.”

The myth of Yankees-Alonso free agency speculation

The initial speculation connecting Alonso to the Yankees seemed logical on the surface. Following Soto’s signing with the Mets, industry observers suggested the Yankees might seek immediate retaliation by targeting Alonso, simultaneously strengthening their lineup while weakening their crosstown rivals. The narrative gained traction given the Yankees’ vacancy at first base and Alonso’s impressive power numbers, which ranked second only to Aaron Judge since 2019.

However, internal dynamics tell a different story. The Yankees’ front office never seriously entertained discussions regarding Alonso, instead pursuing Josh Naylor before ultimately landing Goldschmidt. This sequence of events suggests Alonso was never a primary target in their strategic planning.

The Boras factor part of the equation

A significant element in understanding Alonso’s free agency trajectory involves the influence of his agent, Scott Boras. Known for his aggressive negotiation tactics, Boras established ambitious market expectations for Alonso’s services. Reports indicate he leveraged the Yankees’ perceived interest to elevate his client’s market value, initially projecting a contract exceeding $150 million. However, the actual market has failed to approach these lofty expectations.

This development suggests Brian Cashman and the Yankees’ front office recognized the artificial inflation of Alonso’s market value and deliberately avoided entering the negotiation process.

Strategic preference: Goldschmidt over Alonso

Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports
The Yankees‘ evaluation process revealed specific concerns about Alonso’s overall offensive profile. While his power numbers are undeniable, with 226 home runs in his first six seasons, other aspects of his game raised questions. His on-base percentage, strikeout rate, and defensive metrics lag behind elite first basemen, and his 2024 performance marked a career low with a .788 OPS.

The organization’s ultimate decision to pursue Goldschmidt reflected a preference for a more complete player. Despite his advanced age, Goldschmidt offers superior contact skills, on-base ability, and defensive prowess. Additionally, his contract structure provides greater financial flexibility, aligning with the Yankees’ long-term strategic objectives.

Mets maintain conservative approach

As free agency continues, Alonso remains unsigned, highlighting the miscalculation in his market strategy. His decision to reject a seven-year, $158 million extension from the Mets in 2023 now appears particularly consequential. The current market reality suggests this self-bet may not yield the anticipated returns.

Despite losing Soto to free agency, the Mets have maintained discipline in their negotiations with Alonso. Rather than meeting his initial demands, they’ve diversified their investments, adding players like Jesse Winker and A.J. Minter. Alonso’s rejection of a three-year, $70 million offer from the Mets becomes more significant as alternative opportunities diminish.

Market options dwindling down

The initial landscape of potential suitors for Alonso has contracted significantly. Teams previously linked to the slugger, including the Toronto Blue Jays, Chicago Cubs, and Milwaukee Brewers, have addressed their first base needs through alternative means. This market consolidation leaves Alonso with limited options:

Accept the Mets’ three-year proposal, which reportedly includes an opt-out after 2025
Hold out for a potential late-emerging opportunity, though market indicators suggest this becomes increasingly unlikely

Time pressure mounts for resolution

According to USA Today’s Bob Nightengale, Alonso “badly wants to return” to the Mets, though achieving this outcome may require adjusting his expectations. As Nightengale notes, “It likely will come down to just how much the Mets will pay Alonso in the first year of that three-year contract, which will include an opt-out after the 2025 season to allow Alonso to test the market again.”

Market evolution affects player valuation

Jim McIsaac
Alonso’s free agency experience reflects broader changes in how teams value power-first hitters. Organizations increasingly hesitate to commit premium resources to players whose primary contribution comes through home runs, particularly when accompanied by defensive limitations.

Yankees’ strategic vision validated

The passage of time continues to validate the Yankees’ decision to bypass Alonso. Rather than investing heavily in a one-dimensional power hitter, they’ve constructed a more balanced roster, addressing multiple needs across pitching, outfield depth, and bullpen strength.

As spring training approaches, Alonso faces the possibility of accepting terms below his initial expectations, while the Yankees proceed with a roster constructed for comprehensive competitive success. Their deliberate avoidance of the Alonso sweepstakes increasingly appears to reflect sound strategic judgment.

What do you think? Leave your comment below.